<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 166 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51163</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 1,65,561 imposed on the company, Managing Director, and Director for moving excisable goods without payment of duty. However, the penalty under Rule 173Q was reduced to Rs. 30,000 for the company and Rs. 1,000 each for the Managing Director and Director, as Rule 173Q was found not to apply directly to individuals. The Tribunal modified the original order to reflect the reduced penalties and disposed of the appeals accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:01:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 166 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51163</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 1,65,561 imposed on the company, Managing Director, and Director for moving excisable goods without payment of duty. However, the penalty under Rule 173Q was reduced to Rs. 30,000 for the company and Rs. 1,000 each for the Managing Director and Director, as Rule 173Q was found not to apply directly to individuals. The Tribunal modified the original order to reflect the reduced penalties and disposed of the appeals accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>