https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16185 The dispute concerned repeated arbitral proceedings arising from agreements containing arbitration clauses, after earlier proceedings were abandoned and no liberty was obtained to refile. The Supreme Court stated that Section 11 jurisdiction is confined to the existence of an arbitration agreement and that res judicata does not ordinarily arise at that stage, but the principle of Order 23 Rule 1 of the Code applies to Section 11 proceedings. Accordingly, where an earlier application is withdrawn or abandoned without liberty, a fresh Section 11 application on the same cause of action is not maintainable. en-us Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:55:52 +0530 Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:55:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16185 The dispute concerned repeated arbitral proceedings arising from agreements containing arbitration clauses, after earlier proceedings were abandoned and no liberty was obtained to refile. The Supreme Court stated that Section 11 jurisdiction is confined to the existence of an arbitration agreement and that res judicata does not ordinarily arise at that stage, but the principle of Order 23 Rule 1 of the Code applies to Section 11 proceedings. Accordingly, where an earlier application is withdrawn or abandoned without liberty, a fresh Section 11 application on the same cause of action is not maintainable. Articles Other Topics Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:55:52 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16185