<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 695 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789626</link>
    <description>Services arranged through foreign agents for port formalities, delivery coordination and cargo-handling were held to fall within Steamer Agent Services rather than Business Auxiliary Services, because the specific entry prevailed over the broader general entry. For the pre-1 July 2012 period, service tax under section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 did not apply since the services were rendered abroad and were not received in India, so the statutory charging condition was not met. For the period under the Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012, reverse charge liability also did not arise because the services were rendered and received abroad, outside the taxable territory. The service tax demand and consequential penalties were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:53:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 695 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789626</link>
      <description>Services arranged through foreign agents for port formalities, delivery coordination and cargo-handling were held to fall within Steamer Agent Services rather than Business Auxiliary Services, because the specific entry prevailed over the broader general entry. For the pre-1 July 2012 period, service tax under section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 did not apply since the services were rendered abroad and were not received in India, so the statutory charging condition was not met. For the period under the Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012, reverse charge liability also did not arise because the services were rendered and received abroad, outside the taxable territory. The service tax demand and consequential penalties were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>