https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789633 Under the insolvency statute's strict limitation framework, time spent prosecuting writ petitions in the High Court after expiry of the statutory appeal period could not be excluded when computing limitation for the appeals. The special code did not treat such writ proceedings as a recognised basis for enlarging time, so the appeals remained barred. The High Court, having declined writ interference because an effective statutory remedy was available, could not also direct exclusion of that period for limitation purposes in the appellate forum. The special statute prevailed over any general writ-based relaxation, and the limitation scheme could not be altered through such directions. en-us Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:53:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789633 Under the insolvency statute's strict limitation framework, time spent prosecuting writ petitions in the High Court after expiry of the statutory appeal period could not be excluded when computing limitation for the appeals. The special code did not treat such writ proceedings as a recognised basis for enlarging time, so the appeals remained barred. The High Court, having declined writ interference because an effective statutory remedy was available, could not also direct exclusion of that period for limitation purposes in the appellate forum. The special statute prevailed over any general writ-based relaxation, and the limitation scheme could not be altered through such directions. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789633