<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 160 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51155</link>
    <description>A scientific-equipment exemption notification extended to instruments, apparatus, equipment, and their accessories or spare parts. A trailer certified by the Department of Atomic Energy as required for carrying scientific equipment for research purposes was held to fall within the notification, and it was not excluded merely because it had a vehicle-like form. The exemption was therefore admissible, as the stated use and certification satisfied the notification&#039;s conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 160 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51155</link>
      <description>A scientific-equipment exemption notification extended to instruments, apparatus, equipment, and their accessories or spare parts. A trailer certified by the Department of Atomic Energy as required for carrying scientific equipment for research purposes was held to fall within the notification, and it was not excluded merely because it had a vehicle-like form. The exemption was therefore admissible, as the stated use and certification satisfied the notification&#039;s conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>