<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51154</link>
    <description>The appeal against the adjudication order regarding confiscation of goods, penalties, and duty demand was partially successful. The confiscation of goods in the truck was upheld, but the redemption fine was reduced. The confiscation of excess goods and duty demand for short goods based on estimated shortage and excesses were set aside due to lack of actual weighment evidence. Penalties were upheld for the confiscated goods but the personal penalty on the partner was set aside. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:37:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51154</link>
      <description>The appeal against the adjudication order regarding confiscation of goods, penalties, and duty demand was partially successful. The confiscation of goods in the truck was upheld, but the redemption fine was reduced. The confiscation of excess goods and duty demand for short goods based on estimated shortage and excesses were set aside due to lack of actual weighment evidence. Penalties were upheld for the confiscated goods but the personal penalty on the partner was set aside. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>