<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 726 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789657</link>
    <description>An addition for unexplained cash credit under section 68 was restored because the assessee failed to appear and did not produce supporting evidence, an explanation, or the source of investment during assessment or remand proceedings. The first appellate authority&#039;s deletion was held unsustainable on that evidentiary record, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 726 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789657</link>
      <description>An addition for unexplained cash credit under section 68 was restored because the assessee failed to appear and did not produce supporting evidence, an explanation, or the source of investment during assessment or remand proceedings. The first appellate authority&#039;s deletion was held unsustainable on that evidentiary record, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>