<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 157 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51151</link>
    <description>For tariff classification, go-karts were treated as motor vehicles under Heading 87.03 because their principal design and essential character, including self-propelled operation, steering and braking, showed individual vehicles rather than fairground amusements under Heading 95.08. Roadworthiness or compliance with Motor Vehicles Act registration requirements was held irrelevant to the tariff enquiry. The text also states that a bona fide classification dispute, supported by prior treatment of similar goods, justified relief from penal consequences, so the penalty was set aside and the redemption fine reduced, while the classification finding was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:30:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 157 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51151</link>
      <description>For tariff classification, go-karts were treated as motor vehicles under Heading 87.03 because their principal design and essential character, including self-propelled operation, steering and braking, showed individual vehicles rather than fairground amusements under Heading 95.08. Roadworthiness or compliance with Motor Vehicles Act registration requirements was held irrelevant to the tariff enquiry. The text also states that a bona fide classification dispute, supported by prior treatment of similar goods, justified relief from penal consequences, so the penalty was set aside and the redemption fine reduced, while the classification finding was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>