<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 746 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789677</link>
    <description>The SLP was dismissed because it was filed against the wrong order, and the accompanying application for condonation of delay was also dismissed. In the connected matters, however, delay was condoned and notice was issued, with service directed to be effected by all modes. The operative point is that maintainability of the petition failed on the ground that the challenge was not directed to the correct order, while the related matters proceeded to notice after delay was excused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 10:08:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 746 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789677</link>
      <description>The SLP was dismissed because it was filed against the wrong order, and the accompanying application for condonation of delay was also dismissed. In the connected matters, however, delay was condoned and notice was issued, with service directed to be effected by all modes. The operative point is that maintainability of the petition failed on the ground that the challenge was not directed to the correct order, while the related matters proceeded to notice after delay was excused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>