<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 748 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789679</link>
    <description>An adjudication order passed after existing interim protection was allowed to be withdrawn and set aside, while the show cause notice itself was not quashed on merits. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The challenge to the validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act and MGST Act was expressly left open, and all other contentions were also kept open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:53:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 748 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789679</link>
      <description>An adjudication order passed after existing interim protection was allowed to be withdrawn and set aside, while the show cause notice itself was not quashed on merits. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The challenge to the validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act and MGST Act was expressly left open, and all other contentions were also kept open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>