<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Limitation for personal guarantor insolvency runs from actual invocation of guarantee; earlier default notices do not start time.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98683</link>
    <description>Limitation for Section 95 insolvency proceedings against a personal guarantor ran from the date of actual invocation of the guarantee under Article 137 of the Limitation Act. Communications dated 29.01.2016 and 30.11.2018 were held not to be loan recall notices or effective invocations, as they only referred to default and possible legal action. The clear invocation occurred only on 03.08.2020, when the creditor expressly called upon the guarantor to pay. The proceedings initiated thereafter were therefore within limitation, and the NCLAT upheld their admission and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:53:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:53:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Limitation for personal guarantor insolvency runs from actual invocation of guarantee; earlier default notices do not start time.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98683</link>
      <description>Limitation for Section 95 insolvency proceedings against a personal guarantor ran from the date of actual invocation of the guarantee under Article 137 of the Limitation Act. Communications dated 29.01.2016 and 30.11.2018 were held not to be loan recall notices or effective invocations, as they only referred to default and possible legal action. The clear invocation occurred only on 03.08.2020, when the creditor expressly called upon the guarantor to pay. The proceedings initiated thereafter were therefore within limitation, and the NCLAT upheld their admission and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:53:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>