https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467972 The dismissal of the appeals for non-prosecution was recalled after the tribunal accepted that the appellants had previously participated in the proceedings and had sought adjournments, showing that the appeals were still being pursued. Their absence on the relevant date was treated as inadvertent rather than intentional, and the explanation for non-appearance was found sufficient to justify restoration. The applications were therefore allowed, the dismissal order was set aside, and the appeals were restored to their original number. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Apr 2026 20:17:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467972 The dismissal of the appeals for non-prosecution was recalled after the tribunal accepted that the appellants had previously participated in the proceedings and had sought adjournments, showing that the appeals were still being pursued. Their absence on the relevant date was treated as inadvertent rather than intentional, and the explanation for non-appearance was found sufficient to justify restoration. The applications were therefore allowed, the dismissal order was set aside, and the appeals were restored to their original number. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 26 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467972