https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467988 A writ challenge to an order-in-original was declined where it was filed after about four years and the explanation for the delay was found insufficient. The HC noted that the petitioner had participated in the original proceedings and filed a reply, which weakened any attempt to reopen the tax demand through writ jurisdiction. Applying the principle against entertaining stale claims, the Court refused interference and left open any permissible statutory remedy under the Finance Act, 1994. en-us Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Apr 2026 20:17:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467988 A writ challenge to an order-in-original was declined where it was filed after about four years and the explanation for the delay was found insufficient. The HC noted that the petitioner had participated in the original proceedings and filed a reply, which weakened any attempt to reopen the tax demand through writ jurisdiction. Applying the principle against entertaining stale claims, the Court refused interference and left open any permissible statutory remedy under the Finance Act, 1994. Case-Laws GST Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467988