<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 176 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51140</link>
    <description>Processing yarn into sewing thread was treated as manufacture because dyeing, steaming, washing, finishing, rewinding, waxing and packing produced a distinct commercial commodity known in the market as sewing thread, separate from the input yarn and dutiable under the tariff. The fact that duty may already have been borne on the input was held irrelevant to the manufacture test. Valuation, however, was required to be recomputed on a cum-duty basis, with Modvat credit and penalty also sent back for fresh consideration in light of the revised duty position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:08:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 176 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51140</link>
      <description>Processing yarn into sewing thread was treated as manufacture because dyeing, steaming, washing, finishing, rewinding, waxing and packing produced a distinct commercial commodity known in the market as sewing thread, separate from the input yarn and dutiable under the tariff. The fact that duty may already have been borne on the input was held irrelevant to the manufacture test. Valuation, however, was required to be recomputed on a cum-duty basis, with Modvat credit and penalty also sent back for fresh consideration in light of the revised duty position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>