https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789612 A writ petition concerning a claim for differential duty was not entertained because an alternative statutory appellate remedy was available. The High Court directed the petitioner to pursue that remedy, and the Supreme Court saw no reason to interfere with that course. The petitioner was permitted to file an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), and the special leave petition was disposed of with liberty to avail the appellate remedy. en-us Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:02:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789612 A writ petition concerning a claim for differential duty was not entertained because an alternative statutory appellate remedy was available. The High Court directed the petitioner to pursue that remedy, and the Supreme Court saw no reason to interfere with that course. The petitioner was permitted to file an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), and the special leave petition was disposed of with liberty to avail the appellate remedy. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789612