https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789615 GST orders concerning levy on seigniorage fee royalty and related reverse charge liability were treated as identical to earlier writ petitions raising the same levy question. In light of the pending Supreme Court determination on that issue, the proceedings were kept in abeyance rather than finally decided. The petitions were disposed of on the same terms as the earlier matter, and the petitioner was required to make the stipulated security deposit pending the Supreme Court's decision. en-us Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:02:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789615 GST orders concerning levy on seigniorage fee royalty and related reverse charge liability were treated as identical to earlier writ petitions raising the same levy question. In light of the pending Supreme Court determination on that issue, the proceedings were kept in abeyance rather than finally decided. The petitions were disposed of on the same terms as the earlier matter, and the petitioner was required to make the stipulated security deposit pending the Supreme Court's decision. Case-Laws GST Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789615