https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467945 The Tribunal declined to interfere with confirmation of attachment, holding that it could not reappraise investigative material in a way that would prejudice either side and leaving the appellant to prove lawful acquisition before the trial court. It nevertheless granted limited protective possession of the flat because it was lying unused and deteriorating, directing restoration only for preservation, with status quo safeguards and control over rental income pending final trial. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:01:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467945 The Tribunal declined to interfere with confirmation of attachment, holding that it could not reappraise investigative material in a way that would prejudice either side and leaving the appellant to prove lawful acquisition before the trial court. It nevertheless granted limited protective possession of the flat because it was lying unused and deteriorating, directing restoration only for preservation, with status quo safeguards and control over rental income pending final trial. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467945