<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51128</link>
    <description>Under the compounded levy scheme for re-rolling mills, duty was payable monthly on the basis of annual capacity of production, and the statutory liability was not reduced merely because the factory worked for only part of the month. Abatement was available only if the factory remained closed for more than seven days and the prescribed procedure for claiming that relief was followed. As the assessee sought pro rata payment without complying with the abatement requirements, the full monthly duty remained payable and no further relief was available on account of partial production; the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:46:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51128</link>
      <description>Under the compounded levy scheme for re-rolling mills, duty was payable monthly on the basis of annual capacity of production, and the statutory liability was not reduced merely because the factory worked for only part of the month. Abatement was available only if the factory remained closed for more than seven days and the prescribed procedure for claiming that relief was followed. As the assessee sought pro rata payment without complying with the abatement requirements, the full monthly duty remained payable and no further relief was available on account of partial production; the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>