<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 666 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789597</link>
    <description>Cancellation of GST registration based only on the cancelled status of suppliers&#039; registrations was unsustainable where the authority recorded no cogent finding on the petitioner&#039;s tax invoices, e-way bills, ledger statements or bank statements. The Bombay High Court held that cancellation of a supplier&#039;s registration, by itself, could not justify cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s registration without tangible material showing the petitioner&#039;s involvement in an established illegality connected to the claimed input tax credit. The absence of independent findings on the genuineness of the petitioner&#039;s transactions showed non-application of mind and arbitrariness. The cancellation order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:00:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 666 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789597</link>
      <description>Cancellation of GST registration based only on the cancelled status of suppliers&#039; registrations was unsustainable where the authority recorded no cogent finding on the petitioner&#039;s tax invoices, e-way bills, ledger statements or bank statements. The Bombay High Court held that cancellation of a supplier&#039;s registration, by itself, could not justify cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s registration without tangible material showing the petitioner&#039;s involvement in an established illegality connected to the claimed input tax credit. The absence of independent findings on the genuineness of the petitioner&#039;s transactions showed non-application of mind and arbitrariness. The cancellation order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>