<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 513 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789444</link>
    <description>Freight and transit insurance separately charged from customers were held includable in the assessable value where invoices showed door delivery at the buyer&#039;s premises and no independent arrangement proved that the carrier and insurer acted merely on the buyer&#039;s behalf. Applying Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the place of removal and Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, the charges were treated as part of the sale value. Non-disclosure of this treatment in ER-1 returns, later found from audit of invoices and records, supported invocation of the extended period of limitation and penalty under Section 11AC, with reduced penalty relief left subject to compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 08:09:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 513 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789444</link>
      <description>Freight and transit insurance separately charged from customers were held includable in the assessable value where invoices showed door delivery at the buyer&#039;s premises and no independent arrangement proved that the carrier and insurer acted merely on the buyer&#039;s behalf. Applying Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the place of removal and Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, the charges were treated as part of the sale value. Non-disclosure of this treatment in ER-1 returns, later found from audit of invoices and records, supported invocation of the extended period of limitation and penalty under Section 11AC, with reduced penalty relief left subject to compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>