https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789459 Questions of bona fide purchase and the source of funds for the attached properties were treated as factual matters requiring evidence and cross-examination, and were therefore left for determination by the Special Judge under the PMLA rather than decided in the appellate proceedings. The Tribunal did not adjudicate the merits of the appellants' claim, allowed them to pursue the issue before that forum, and directed that status quo be maintained over the properties pending such determination. en-us Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Apr 2026 08:09:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789459 Questions of bona fide purchase and the source of funds for the attached properties were treated as factual matters requiring evidence and cross-examination, and were therefore left for determination by the Special Judge under the PMLA rather than decided in the appellate proceedings. The Tribunal did not adjudicate the merits of the appellants' claim, allowed them to pursue the issue before that forum, and directed that status quo be maintained over the properties pending such determination. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789459