<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 540 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789471</link>
    <description>Reliable composition testing was treated as adequate for classifying the imported goods, because the CRCL Kandla reports recorded textured polyester content below the level claimed by the importer and the belated request for retest could not be acted upon. Valuation, however, was not finally sustained because the respondent had not been given the comparable data and invoices needed to rebut the enhancement, so the matter required fresh adjudication with disclosure and opportunity. The adjudicating authority was also directed not to travel beyond the show cause notice, and the exemption under Notification No. 137/2000-Cus. was left to be re-determined after clarification of the Letter of Permission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 08:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 540 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789471</link>
      <description>Reliable composition testing was treated as adequate for classifying the imported goods, because the CRCL Kandla reports recorded textured polyester content below the level claimed by the importer and the belated request for retest could not be acted upon. Valuation, however, was not finally sustained because the respondent had not been given the comparable data and invoices needed to rebut the enhancement, so the matter required fresh adjudication with disclosure and opportunity. The adjudicating authority was also directed not to travel beyond the show cause notice, and the exemption under Notification No. 137/2000-Cus. was left to be re-determined after clarification of the Letter of Permission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>