<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 547 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789478</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the special leave petition. The underlying issue concerned non-invocability of the extended period of limitation, which had already been accepted by the CESTAT and affirmed by the High Court. The Court found no case for further intervention in view of those reasons and the limitation finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 08:09:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 547 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789478</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the special leave petition. The underlying issue concerned non-invocability of the extended period of limitation, which had already been accepted by the CESTAT and affirmed by the High Court. The Court found no case for further intervention in view of those reasons and the limitation finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>