<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 557 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789488</link>
    <description>Search-related assessments were examined for compliance with statutory approval requirements, with the record indicating no demonstrably valid transmission and verification of the seized and appraisal material before approval; the assessments were therefore treated as invalid in law. For assessment years 2021-22 and 2022-23, the post-search regime was applied, and reassessment under section 147 read with section 148 was considered the proper framework rather than section 143(3). The Tribunal also accepted partial relief on unexplained property investment where the seized document reflected a lower figure, and directed telescoping of cash in the individual&#039;s hands against cash already assessed in the company to avoid double addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 16:57:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 557 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789488</link>
      <description>Search-related assessments were examined for compliance with statutory approval requirements, with the record indicating no demonstrably valid transmission and verification of the seized and appraisal material before approval; the assessments were therefore treated as invalid in law. For assessment years 2021-22 and 2022-23, the post-search regime was applied, and reassessment under section 147 read with section 148 was considered the proper framework rather than section 143(3). The Tribunal also accepted partial relief on unexplained property investment where the seized document reflected a lower figure, and directed telescoping of cash in the individual&#039;s hands against cash already assessed in the company to avoid double addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>