<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 119 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51103</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value for old bearings sold in a stock clearance sale was accepted because the goods were 5-10 years old, discounts could commercially apply, and no evidence showed that the declared price was not the actual price paid or payable. The manufacturer&#039;s price list was held not to be conclusive proof of value, so the declared value could not be rejected merely for differing from that list. On that basis, enhancement of value was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:38:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 119 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51103</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value for old bearings sold in a stock clearance sale was accepted because the goods were 5-10 years old, discounts could commercially apply, and no evidence showed that the declared price was not the actual price paid or payable. The manufacturer&#039;s price list was held not to be conclusive proof of value, so the declared value could not be rejected merely for differing from that list. On that basis, enhancement of value was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>