<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1999 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467898</link>
    <description>For warehoused imported goods, duty liability is determined by the date of the customs out of charge order for home consumption, because that order crystallises the duty position. Continued warehousing after the order is only a storage arrangement and does not reopen the applicable rate or tariff value. On the admitted facts, the out of charge orders were issued before the later tariff value notification took effect, so the notification could not be applied to levy differential duty on the consignments. The appellate court therefore set aside the Single Judge&#039;s judgment and allowed the writ appeal in favour of the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:27:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1999 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467898</link>
      <description>For warehoused imported goods, duty liability is determined by the date of the customs out of charge order for home consumption, because that order crystallises the duty position. Continued warehousing after the order is only a storage arrangement and does not reopen the applicable rate or tariff value. On the admitted facts, the out of charge orders were issued before the later tariff value notification took effect, so the notification could not be applied to levy differential duty on the consignments. The appellate court therefore set aside the Single Judge&#039;s judgment and allowed the writ appeal in favour of the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>