<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1733 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467907</link>
    <description>A later restriction on set-off of excess application under Explanation 5 to section 11, effective from 01.04.2021, did not apply to the relevant assessment years, so belated filing of the return did not by itself deny carry-forward set-off of excess expenditure. By contrast, corpus treatment of voluntary contributions depends on proof of a specific donor direction under section 11(1)(d); where the record was unclear on that point, the matter required fresh factual examination and was remitted for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:27:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1733 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467907</link>
      <description>A later restriction on set-off of excess application under Explanation 5 to section 11, effective from 01.04.2021, did not apply to the relevant assessment years, so belated filing of the return did not by itself deny carry-forward set-off of excess expenditure. By contrast, corpus treatment of voluntary contributions depends on proof of a specific donor direction under section 11(1)(d); where the record was unclear on that point, the matter required fresh factual examination and was remitted for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>