<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1392 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467922</link>
    <description>Reassessment proceedings under section 148A(d) were examined against the limitation framework in section 149 and the time available after the Supreme Court&#039;s directions on reopening. The order under section 148A(d) was passed after the surviving statutory period had expired, so the section 148A proceedings were time-barred. As the foundational notice and reassessment steps were beyond the permitted window, the consequential reassessment could not be sustained in law and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:27:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1392 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467922</link>
      <description>Reassessment proceedings under section 148A(d) were examined against the limitation framework in section 149 and the time available after the Supreme Court&#039;s directions on reopening. The order under section 148A(d) was passed after the surviving statutory period had expired, so the section 148A proceedings were time-barred. As the foundational notice and reassessment steps were beyond the permitted window, the consequential reassessment could not be sustained in law and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>