<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1405 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467887</link>
    <description>The Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 gives the Corporation a statutory right to recover amounts paid to depositors from the liquidator. Section 21, read with Regulation 22, operates notwithstanding conflicting law and requires repayment once the liquidator&#039;s realisations, after provision for expenses, are sufficient to enable a dividend of at least one paisa in the rupee to each depositor. The scheme does not create a general priority over all creditors, but it does require the Corporation&#039;s repayment to be made before further distribution to other claimants once the statutory threshold is met. The liquidator must therefore apply the repayment mechanism before distributing surplus funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 18:21:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1405 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467887</link>
      <description>The Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 gives the Corporation a statutory right to recover amounts paid to depositors from the liquidator. Section 21, read with Regulation 22, operates notwithstanding conflicting law and requires repayment once the liquidator&#039;s realisations, after provision for expenses, are sufficient to enable a dividend of at least one paisa in the rupee to each depositor. The scheme does not create a general priority over all creditors, but it does require the Corporation&#039;s repayment to be made before further distribution to other claimants once the statutory threshold is met. The liquidator must therefore apply the repayment mechanism before distributing surplus funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>