<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 107 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51092</link>
    <description>Rule 57E(2) permitted cash refund where credit taken on duty was later varied and adjustment could not be made. After differential duty was paid on finalisation of provisional assessments and a certificate was issued by the jurisdictional Superintendent, the Tribunal read the rule as allowing variation of the credit by adjustment, and, if adjustment was not possible, reimbursement in cash. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s claim for cash refund was sustainable and was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:12:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 107 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51092</link>
      <description>Rule 57E(2) permitted cash refund where credit taken on duty was later varied and adjustment could not be made. After differential duty was paid on finalisation of provisional assessments and a certificate was issued by the jurisdictional Superintendent, the Tribunal read the rule as allowing variation of the credit by adjustment, and, if adjustment was not possible, reimbursement in cash. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s claim for cash refund was sustainable and was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>