https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789355 In Section 34 proceedings, a severable arbitral award may be interfered with only to the extent it conflicts with the contract or lacks legal support. The High Court upheld release of amounts withheld for missed milestones because the contract contemplated rescheduling and repeated extensions without rescheduling made the withholding unsustainable. It set aside interest on the withheld sums because the contract expressly barred interest on automatic withholding. It corrected the final-bill figure to the admitted amount, rejected the claimed GST differential for want of proof of actual payment, and set aside prolongation damages under Section 73 because actual loss was not established. The refund of penalty for delay in the sample flat was upheld. en-us Sat, 04 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Apr 2026 08:56:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789355 In Section 34 proceedings, a severable arbitral award may be interfered with only to the extent it conflicts with the contract or lacks legal support. The High Court upheld release of amounts withheld for missed milestones because the contract contemplated rescheduling and repeated extensions without rescheduling made the withholding unsustainable. It set aside interest on the withheld sums because the contract expressly barred interest on automatic withholding. It corrected the final-bill figure to the admitted amount, rejected the claimed GST differential for want of proof of actual payment, and set aside prolongation damages under Section 73 because actual loss was not established. The refund of penalty for delay in the sample flat was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 04 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789355