https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789369 Professional misconduct findings against a Resolution Professional were examined in the context of the CIRP, including treatment of a resolution applicant as an investor, later attempts to make the applicant a co-applicant, and alleged non-compliance with statutory eligibility requirements for a valid resolution plan. The appellate forum declined interference because disciplinary proceedings had already recorded contravention and imposed penalty, and the foundational order had been affirmed by the Supreme Court. In those circumstances, it held that no contrary view should be taken on the same conduct, and the adverse observations with the reference to the insolvency regulator were left undisturbed. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Apr 2026 08:56:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789369 Professional misconduct findings against a Resolution Professional were examined in the context of the CIRP, including treatment of a resolution applicant as an investor, later attempts to make the applicant a co-applicant, and alleged non-compliance with statutory eligibility requirements for a valid resolution plan. The appellate forum declined interference because disciplinary proceedings had already recorded contravention and imposed penalty, and the foundational order had been affirmed by the Supreme Court. In those circumstances, it held that no contrary view should be taken on the same conduct, and the adverse observations with the reference to the insolvency regulator were left undisturbed. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789369