https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51085 An earlier final order was recalled under Rule 41 because the appeal had been decided on merits without first recording a finding on the preliminary issue of limitation, despite submissions on that point having been noted. The omission was treated as an apparent error on the face of the record, and recall was considered necessary to prevent miscarriage of justice. The application for recall was allowed, and the matter was directed to be reheard and disposed of afresh. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:56:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51085 An earlier final order was recalled under Rule 41 because the appeal had been decided on merits without first recording a finding on the preliminary issue of limitation, despite submissions on that point having been noted. The omission was treated as an apparent error on the face of the record, and recall was considered necessary to prevent miscarriage of justice. The application for recall was allowed, and the matter was directed to be reheard and disposed of afresh. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51085