<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 485 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789416</link>
    <description>Where purchases are suspected to be bogus but corresponding sales are accepted, the entire purchase amount should not be treated as income. The proper approach is to doubt only the genuineness of the purchases and bring to tax the profit element embedded in them, rather than make a 100% disallowance of the purchase value. On the stated facts, estimation of 8% of the disputed purchases was considered an appropriate method for taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 08:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 485 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789416</link>
      <description>Where purchases are suspected to be bogus but corresponding sales are accepted, the entire purchase amount should not be treated as income. The proper approach is to doubt only the genuineness of the purchases and bring to tax the profit element embedded in them, rather than make a 100% disallowance of the purchase value. On the stated facts, estimation of 8% of the disputed purchases was considered an appropriate method for taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>