https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789429 Writ interference with detention, confiscation and demand proceedings was declined where goods were moved without an e-way bill, tax and penalty had already been paid, and the statutory forms bore the petitioner's signature. The Court relied on the contemporaneous record, including the detention and release documents, and noted suppression and shifting stands on material facts. In those circumstances, the confiscation proceedings were not shown to be illegal, and the availability of an appellate remedy further weighed against entertaining the writ on merits. en-us Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Apr 2026 08:56:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789429 Writ interference with detention, confiscation and demand proceedings was declined where goods were moved without an e-way bill, tax and penalty had already been paid, and the statutory forms bore the petitioner's signature. The Court relied on the contemporaneous record, including the detention and release documents, and noted suppression and shifting stands on material facts. In those circumstances, the confiscation proceedings were not shown to be illegal, and the availability of an appellate remedy further weighed against entertaining the writ on merits. Case-Laws GST Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789429