<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 162 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51081</link>
    <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be sustained on disowned or unproved records, such as an empty bag register or notebook entries, without independent corroboration. Electricity consumption figures alone are insufficient unless supported by evidence of excess raw material, finished goods, stock variation, buyer statements, or other reliable material. On that basis, the larger demand failed and was upheld only to the limited extent supported by notebook entries for a four-day period. Penalty under Section 11AC could not apply for a period before its introduction, and penalties under Rule 173Q and Rule 209A were also set aside for want of facts establishing company liability or individual culpability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:45:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 162 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51081</link>
      <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be sustained on disowned or unproved records, such as an empty bag register or notebook entries, without independent corroboration. Electricity consumption figures alone are insufficient unless supported by evidence of excess raw material, finished goods, stock variation, buyer statements, or other reliable material. On that basis, the larger demand failed and was upheld only to the limited extent supported by notebook entries for a four-day period. Penalty under Section 11AC could not apply for a period before its introduction, and penalties under Rule 173Q and Rule 209A were also set aside for want of facts establishing company liability or individual culpability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>