<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1793 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467875</link>
    <description>Statutory refund interest had already been paid before disposal, but the Court held that prolonged delay and repeated recourse to the Tribunal and Court justified an award of costs against the GST department. The operative point was that delayed payment of admitted refund interest, followed by unnecessary litigation to recover it, can attract compensatory costs in favour of the claimant. The petition was therefore disposed of with costs awarded to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 18:30:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1793 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467875</link>
      <description>Statutory refund interest had already been paid before disposal, but the Court held that prolonged delay and repeated recourse to the Tribunal and Court justified an award of costs against the GST department. The operative point was that delayed payment of admitted refund interest, followed by unnecessary litigation to recover it, can attract compensatory costs in favour of the claimant. The petition was therefore disposed of with costs awarded to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>