<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2114 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467871</link>
    <description>After a valid transfer of jurisdiction under section 127(2), the earlier Assessing Officer lacked authority to issue a section 148 notice or obtain sanction, so the reassessment was void ab initio. In section 153A proceedings for completed and unabated years, additions for long-term capital gains, cash loans and notional interest required incriminating material found in the assessee&#039;s own search. Material from other searches, third-party statements and estimated inferences, without corroborative evidence in the assessee&#039;s premises, was insufficient. A retracted section 132(4) statement, standing alone, could not sustain the additions, so the disputed additions were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 14:07:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2114 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467871</link>
      <description>After a valid transfer of jurisdiction under section 127(2), the earlier Assessing Officer lacked authority to issue a section 148 notice or obtain sanction, so the reassessment was void ab initio. In section 153A proceedings for completed and unabated years, additions for long-term capital gains, cash loans and notional interest required incriminating material found in the assessee&#039;s own search. Material from other searches, third-party statements and estimated inferences, without corroborative evidence in the assessee&#039;s premises, was insufficient. A retracted section 132(4) statement, standing alone, could not sustain the additions, so the disputed additions were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>