<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1591 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467874</link>
    <description>Section 153C proceedings require the jurisdictional Assessing Officer to record satisfaction that seized books, documents or assets pertain to the other person and bear on determination of that person&#039;s total income. The notes identify that proceedings were initiated after the statutory exclusion became applicable to searches initiated on or after 1 April 2021, rendering the initiation without jurisdiction. They also identify that the satisfaction note lacked the required finding connecting the seized material to determination of total income, leaving the jurisdictional precondition unmet. On these grounds, the assessments for the relevant years were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1591 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467874</link>
      <description>Section 153C proceedings require the jurisdictional Assessing Officer to record satisfaction that seized books, documents or assets pertain to the other person and bear on determination of that person&#039;s total income. The notes identify that proceedings were initiated after the statutory exclusion became applicable to searches initiated on or after 1 April 2021, rendering the initiation without jurisdiction. They also identify that the satisfaction note lacked the required finding connecting the seized material to determination of total income, leaving the jurisdictional precondition unmet. On these grounds, the assessments for the relevant years were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>