https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51073 Compliance with a pre-deposit direction under Section 35F was accepted where the appellant made staggered payments that together satisfied the ordered amount. The Tribunal treated piecemeal deposit, made due to financial difficulty, as sufficient fulfilment of the deposit condition and noted that the Revenue did not seriously oppose restoration. On that basis, the appeal was restored to its original number and directed to proceed for regular hearing. en-us Fri, 07 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:24:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51073 Compliance with a pre-deposit direction under Section 35F was accepted where the appellant made staggered payments that together satisfied the ordered amount. The Tribunal treated piecemeal deposit, made due to financial difficulty, as sufficient fulfilment of the deposit condition and noted that the Revenue did not seriously oppose restoration. On that basis, the appeal was restored to its original number and directed to proceed for regular hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51073