<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 261 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51069</link>
    <description>30% shareholding by a foreign supplier in an Indian importer did not, by itself, establish mutuality of interest or make the parties related persons under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. Without evidence that the relationship influenced the declared price, and without contemporaneous imports of identical goods at higher prices to support comparison, rejection of the transaction value and resort to an alternative valuation method was not justified. The enhancement of assessable value was therefore held unsustainable, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 261 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51069</link>
      <description>30% shareholding by a foreign supplier in an Indian importer did not, by itself, establish mutuality of interest or make the parties related persons under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. Without evidence that the relationship influenced the declared price, and without contemporaneous imports of identical goods at higher prices to support comparison, rejection of the transaction value and resort to an alternative valuation method was not justified. The enhancement of assessable value was therefore held unsustainable, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>