<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51068</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because prior permission of the Excise authorities had not been obtained where the duplicate invoice was lost after credit was taken and the loss was duly established. The appellant had taken credit on the strength of the duplicate invoice, promptly informed the department of the loss, and also lodged a police report; these facts were undisputed. The earlier requirement to prove loss to the satisfaction of the competent authority was met on the record, so denial based only on absence of prior permission was unsustainable. The issue was therefore decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:17:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51068</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because prior permission of the Excise authorities had not been obtained where the duplicate invoice was lost after credit was taken and the loss was duly established. The appellant had taken credit on the strength of the duplicate invoice, promptly informed the department of the loss, and also lodged a police report; these facts were undisputed. The earlier requirement to prove loss to the satisfaction of the competent authority was met on the record, so denial based only on absence of prior permission was unsustainable. The issue was therefore decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>