https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467860 The appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the appellant company had been liquidated in insolvency proceedings under an NCLT order. The tribunal noted that earlier appeals of the same appellant had also been dismissed on the same basis. Applying Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, it held that no further adjudication survived once the company stood liquidated. en-us Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:43:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467860 The appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the appellant company had been liquidated in insolvency proceedings under an NCLT order. The tribunal noted that earlier appeals of the same appellant had also been dismissed on the same basis. Applying Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, it held that no further adjudication survived once the company stood liquidated. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467860