<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 372 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789303</link>
    <description>Service tax was held not chargeable to a dealer on optional extended warranty amounts paid directly by customers to the manufacturer, because the dealer received only commission and had no direct collection or independent liability for the warranty service. Teflon coating and under body coating were also held outside business auxiliary service, as the work was done before sale at the customer&#039;s option, using the dealer&#039;s own labour, and the materials were treated as a sale of goods rather than agency activity. The tax demands, with consequential interest and penalties, did not survive and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 10:33:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 372 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789303</link>
      <description>Service tax was held not chargeable to a dealer on optional extended warranty amounts paid directly by customers to the manufacturer, because the dealer received only commission and had no direct collection or independent liability for the warranty service. Teflon coating and under body coating were also held outside business auxiliary service, as the work was done before sale at the customer&#039;s option, using the dealer&#039;s own labour, and the materials were treated as a sale of goods rather than agency activity. The tax demands, with consequential interest and penalties, did not survive and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>