<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 208 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51062</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, dismissed the appeal, upholding decisions against the appellants regarding the interpretation of the effective date of Notification No. 28/95-C.E. The tribunal affirmed the inapplicability of Modvat credit beyond the stipulated time frame and the notification&#039;s effective date based on legal interpretations. The tribunal emphasized the binding nature of Supreme Court rulings and Tribunal precedents, concluding that the issues had been conclusively settled against the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:05:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 208 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51062</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, dismissed the appeal, upholding decisions against the appellants regarding the interpretation of the effective date of Notification No. 28/95-C.E. The tribunal affirmed the inapplicability of Modvat credit beyond the stipulated time frame and the notification&#039;s effective date based on legal interpretations. The tribunal emphasized the binding nature of Supreme Court rulings and Tribunal precedents, concluding that the issues had been conclusively settled against the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>