<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 380 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789311</link>
    <description>A liquidation sale conducted on an unconditional disclaimer basis bound the successful bidder to the auction notice and process document. The bidder could not demand reliefs or concessions beyond those terms, as caveat emptor applied and later claims were barred by estoppel. A subsequent application seeking completion of the sale and the same or enlarged concessions was also not maintainable after an earlier similar request had been withdrawn unconditionally without liberty, since the issue could not be re-agitated through a fresh application. The pending challenge to the auction further weighed against immediate completion of the sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:48:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 380 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789311</link>
      <description>A liquidation sale conducted on an unconditional disclaimer basis bound the successful bidder to the auction notice and process document. The bidder could not demand reliefs or concessions beyond those terms, as caveat emptor applied and later claims were barred by estoppel. A subsequent application seeking completion of the sale and the same or enlarged concessions was also not maintainable after an earlier similar request had been withdrawn unconditionally without liberty, since the issue could not be re-agitated through a fresh application. The pending challenge to the auction further weighed against immediate completion of the sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>