<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 397 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789328</link>
    <description>An assessee covered by section 10(23C)(iv) was required to comply with Form 10BB, not Form 10B, and the mismatch in the form filed did not justify denial of exemption. The record showed that the exemption claim had been consistently accepted in earlier and later years, which supported the assessee&#039;s entitlement. On that basis, the adjustment made while processing the return was unsustainable, and the exemption could not be refused merely for the stated form-related defect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:48:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 397 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789328</link>
      <description>An assessee covered by section 10(23C)(iv) was required to comply with Form 10BB, not Form 10B, and the mismatch in the form filed did not justify denial of exemption. The record showed that the exemption claim had been consistently accepted in earlier and later years, which supported the assessee&#039;s entitlement. On that basis, the adjustment made while processing the return was unsustainable, and the exemption could not be refused merely for the stated form-related defect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>