<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 398 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789329</link>
    <description>Where reassessment was initiated on the alleged taxability of notional annual letting value on unsold flats, the Assessing Officer was required to conduct a focused enquiry on that specific issue. A reassessment order that merely recites issuance of notices and receipt of replies, without discussion, verification, analysis, or a finding on the escapement point, reflects lack of enquiry rather than inadequate enquiry. In such circumstances, Explanation 2(a) to section 263 treats the order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, so the Principal Commissioner may validly invoke revisionary jurisdiction. The revisional order was therefore sustained and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:48:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 398 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789329</link>
      <description>Where reassessment was initiated on the alleged taxability of notional annual letting value on unsold flats, the Assessing Officer was required to conduct a focused enquiry on that specific issue. A reassessment order that merely recites issuance of notices and receipt of replies, without discussion, verification, analysis, or a finding on the escapement point, reflects lack of enquiry rather than inadequate enquiry. In such circumstances, Explanation 2(a) to section 263 treats the order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, so the Principal Commissioner may validly invoke revisionary jurisdiction. The revisional order was therefore sustained and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>