<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 421 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789352</link>
    <description>An adjudication order under the GST regime was quashed where the assessee was given only a truncated and ineffective opportunity to file additional material, and the request for adjournment was not shown to have been considered. The High Court held that a statutory hearing must be real, reasonable and effective, and that mere participation in the personal hearing did not cure the breach of natural justice. It further held that the availability of an appellate remedy did not bar writ intervention where the challenge went to the fairness of the adjudicatory process itself. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after granting a proper hearing and considering all contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:48:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 421 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789352</link>
      <description>An adjudication order under the GST regime was quashed where the assessee was given only a truncated and ineffective opportunity to file additional material, and the request for adjournment was not shown to have been considered. The High Court held that a statutory hearing must be real, reasonable and effective, and that mere participation in the personal hearing did not cure the breach of natural justice. It further held that the availability of an appellate remedy did not bar writ intervention where the challenge went to the fairness of the adjudicatory process itself. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after granting a proper hearing and considering all contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>