<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Business loss and bad debt write-off allowed where employee balances were irrecoverable and account write-off was shown.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98523</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that irrecoverable driver and employee balances written off were allowable as business loss, as the facts were identical to an earlier year in the assessee&#039;s own case and no distinguishing feature was shown by the Revenue; the disallowance was therefore unsustainable on the principle of consistency. It further held that a bad debt claim cannot be denied merely because the assessee did not prove exhaustive recovery efforts, since after the statutory amendment and the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in TRF Ltd., the governing requirement is write-off in the accounts. The additions on account of both items were directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:48:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:48:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Business loss and bad debt write-off allowed where employee balances were irrecoverable and account write-off was shown.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98523</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that irrecoverable driver and employee balances written off were allowable as business loss, as the facts were identical to an earlier year in the assessee&#039;s own case and no distinguishing feature was shown by the Revenue; the disallowance was therefore unsustainable on the principle of consistency. It further held that a bad debt claim cannot be denied merely because the assessee did not prove exhaustive recovery efforts, since after the statutory amendment and the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in TRF Ltd., the governing requirement is write-off in the accounts. The additions on account of both items were directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:48:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>